United States v. Timothy J. Swanson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the use of the wrong version of the guidelines was harmless as to the calculation of the loss because the error wouldn’t affect the offense level
• rejecting defendant’s claim that “any overdrafts on his accounts were secured by collateral he had previously pledged to the bank on various loans”
• affirming a bank fraud conviction involving eleven accounts at a single bank
• where actual loss from check kiting scheme was zero and intended loss was $522,064, district court properly calculated total loss at $522,064
• \Mr. Swanson's conduct put the bank at a risk of loss equal to the sum of his bank accounts' overdrafts each day . . . .\
• “Since Bailey adduces no evidence that his employer thought he was unfit for either a class or a broad range of jobs, his ‘regarded as’ claim on disability must fail.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).