United States v. Timothy J. Julian

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 413 does not deprive a defendant of the equal protection of the law in violation of the Due Process Clause
• holding that Rule 413 does not deprive a defendant of the equal protection of the law in violation of the Due Process Clause
• noting that “sexual assault cases, especially cases involving victims who are juveniles, often raise unique questions regarding the credibility of the victims which render a defendant’s prior conduct especially probative.”
• admitting evidence of prior sexual assault crimes against minor due to its probative value in sex trafficking prosecution
• “Rule 413 * * * alters the legal landscape with respect to a defendant’s prior crimes in cases like this one.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).