Skip to main content
· 3/3/1949

United States v. Timken Roller Bearing Co.

Citations

  • 83 F. Supp. 284
  • 81 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 28
  • 1949 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2852

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in order for the Sherman Act to assist the free flow of commerce, good business purposes cannot justify restraints of trade
  • division of markets, price fixing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Freed

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.