United States v. Thurman Reed, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding that because the knowledge-and-acquiescence factor was clearly met, the court must determine whether a private individual intended \to further his own ends ... or assist law enforcement efforts\
• deciding that because the knowledge-and-acquiescence factor was clearly met, the court must determine whether a private individual intended \to further his own ends . . . or assist law enforcement efforts\
• deciding that because the knowledge-and-acquiescence factor was clearly met, the court must determine whether a private individual intended \to further his own ends . . . or assist law enforcement efforts\
• deciding that because the knowledge-and-acquiescence factor was clearly met, the court must determine whether a private individual intended \to further his own ends . . . or assist law enforcement efforts\
• deciding that because the knowledge-and-acquiescence factor was clearly met, the court must determine whether a private individual intended \to further his own ends . . . or assist law enforcement efforts\
• holding that, in opening a briefcase and dresser drawer, the private party “had no legitimate independent motive within the meaning of [this court’s] cases; ‘snooping’ is not a legitimate motive and finding evidence of criminal activity is not independent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).