United States v. Three Thousand Baskets of Champagne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “An ex parte TRO is only appropriate where the applicant would face irreparable harm so immediate that it would be improper to wait until after a preliminary injunction hearing to enjoin the non- movant’s conduct.”
• “An ex parte TRO is only appropriate where the applicant would face irreparable harm so immediate that it would be improper to wait until after a preliminary injunction hearing to enjoin the non- movant’s conduct.”
• “Plaintiff must carry a heavy burden to demonstrate 1 The court’s order did not lay out its reasoning, instead referencing “the reasons stated on the record.” (ECF No. 17-6, PageID.311.) But the hearing transcript (ECF No. 15-2
• finding service is a prerequisite to entering a preliminary injunction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).