United States v. Thongsophaporn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant freely initiated further communications with law enforcement officer by asking “what was going on,” notwithstanding his initial statement that he did not wish to answer any questions
• applying totality of circumstances test, including second set of rights warnings as factor
• “Section 1983, of course, does not apply to allegedly unlawful acts of federal officers.”
• “what is going on?” same
• asking \what was going on[?]\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).