United States v. Thomas Whitlow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that violations of an employer drug testing statute result in \injuries to the person\ as defined in Commerce Oil because the nature of the right from that statute was analogous to an invasion of privacy and thus was subject to the § 9-1-14(b) statute of limitations
• holding that violations of an employer drug testing statute result in “injuries to the person” as defined in Commerce Oil because the nature of the right from that statute was analogous to an invasion of privacy and thus was subject to the § 9-1-14(b) statute of limitations
• treating a premature notice of appeal as timely filed
• treating a premature notice of appeal as timely filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).