Skip to main content
· 1/20/1995

United States v. Thomas Taylor

Citations

  • 45 F.3d 1104
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 1193
  • 1995 WL 20424

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \The district court's conclusion ... was not unreasonable and it was therefore not clear error to apply this enhancement.\
  • district court entitled to infer the defendant met the income threshold because the defendant's drug habit required more than the minimum annual income to maintain and he had no legitimate income during the relevant period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Manion, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.