United States v. Thomas Richard Henry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Even if the inference relied upon by [defendant] does rise to the level of a reasonable hypothesis, it is not necessary that the [government’s] evidence exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence.”
• “We … note that [an element of the crime] may be established, like most other facts, by circumstantial evidence, even if the jury might draw other reasonable inferences from the circumstantial evidence.”
• “It is not necessary that the evidence exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence or be wholly inconsistent with every conclusion except that of guilt, provided a reasonable trier of fact could find that the evidence establishes guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).