· 6/18/2014
United States v. Thomas Reyes
Citations
- 755 F.3d 210
- 2014 WL 2747216
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 11418
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “the Supreme Court has not chosen to apply Alleyne’s new rule retroactively to cases on collateral review”
- stating that “the decision to make Alleyne retroactive rests exclusively with the Supreme Court, which has not chosen to do so.”
- holding that A/eyne is not to be applied retroactively
- holding Alleyne is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review
- concluding Alleyne does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review
- “[T]he Supreme Court has not chosen to apply Alleyne’s new rule retroactively to cases on collateral review’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McKee, Chagares, Nygaard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.