Skip to main content
· 6/18/2014

United States v. Thomas Reyes

Citations

  • 755 F.3d 210
  • 2014 WL 2747216
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 11418

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the Supreme Court has not chosen to apply Alleyne’s new rule retroactively to cases on collateral review”
  • stating that “the decision to make Alleyne retroactive rests exclusively with the Supreme Court, which has not chosen to do so.”
  • holding that A/eyne is not to be applied retroactively
  • holding Alleyne is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review
  • concluding Alleyne does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review
  • “[T]he Supreme Court has not chosen to apply Alleyne’s new rule retroactively to cases on collateral review’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKee, Chagares, Nygaard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.