United States v. Thomas R. Hochschild

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a corporate officer was bound by an injunction directed at the corporation
• explaining that “whenever an injunction, whatever its nature may be, is directed to a corporation, it also runs against the corporation’s officers, in their corporate capacities”
• noting that “more [cases] have held that officers or employees of corporate and business entities are subject to in personam jurisdiction for purposes of contempt if they have notice of the injunction and its contents”
• “an officer personally identified with corporation defendant had actual notice of injunction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).