United States v. Thomas R. Fuller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court did not clearly err in finding consent voluntary where the defendant “was eighteen years old at the time, a high school graduate, and there is no evidence that the police threatened or coerced him”
• upholding conviction of aider and abettor when the principal defendant was acquitted
• district court did not clearly err in finding voluntary consent where there were three armed officers present, the person consenting was an adult with a high school education, and there was “no evidence that the police threatened or coerced him”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).