United States v. Thomas Nelson, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that physical characteristics that are ob- servable to anyone who interacts with a client like demeanor, bearing, or sobriety are not protected by attorney-client privilege
• considering whether factual basis recited in withdrawn plea agreement was admissible despite the protections of Rule 410(a) because the agreement contained a Rule 410(a) waiver
• “[I]f the evidence suggests that the defendant was an unwary criminal who readily availed himself of the opportunity to perpetrate the crime, then predisposition is present.”
• discussing requirements for co-conspirator exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).