Skip to main content
· 6/10/2004

United States v. Thomas Narog

Citations

  • 372 F.3d 1243
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 11467
  • 2004 WL 1299872

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the government was required to prove that the defendants conspired to distribute the specific drug referenced in the indictment because the indictment charged a subset of the statutory offense
  • finding constructive amendment due to a broadening of the possible bases for conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilson, Fay, Meskill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.