· 6/10/2004
United States v. Thomas Narog
Citations
- 372 F.3d 1243
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 11467
- 2004 WL 1299872
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the government was required to prove that the defendants conspired to distribute the specific drug referenced in the indictment because the indictment charged a subset of the statutory offense
- finding constructive amendment due to a broadening of the possible bases for conviction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilson, Fay, Meskill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.