United States v. Thomas N. Shiomos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the sua sponte decision to sequester the jury in light of publicity concerns, which affected the jury composition, did not warrant relief in the absence of some showing of partiality
• declining to find reversible error in a jury sequestration order that affected the composition of the jury where the defendant “has not shown that some class of jurors was improperly excluded . . . or that the panel ultimately chosen was in any way not impartial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).