Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 6/13/1995

United States v. Thomas McGowan

Citations

  • 58 F.3d 8
  • 149 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2589
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 14603
  • 1995 WL 354269

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • barring tort claims under Arizona law because plaintiff sought 9 “to recover purely ‘benefit of the bargain’ ” economic losses based on “foreseeable risks 10 [that] could have been—and indeed were—allocated by the parties in their contractual 11 agreement”
  • “Dismissal without leave to amend is 15 improper unless it is clear . . . the complaint could not be saved by any amendment.” 16 (citation omitted)
  • same with respect to 29 U.S.C. § 186 and a non-union-representative

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Graafeiland, Winter, Leval

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.