United States v. Thomas McGowan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• barring tort claims under Arizona law because plaintiff sought 9 “to recover purely ‘benefit of the bargain’ ” economic losses based on “foreseeable risks 10 [that] could have been—and indeed were—allocated by the parties in their contractual 11 agreement”
• “Dismissal without leave to amend is 15 improper unless it is clear . . . the complaint could not be saved by any amendment.” 16 (citation omitted)
• same with respect to 29 U.S.C. § 186 and a non-union-representative

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).