United States v. Thomas M. Lutz and Howard E. Olsen, Iii, Thomas M. Lutz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that indictment could be regarded as charging in effect that kidnapping was for purpose of raping victim and was therefore within federal kidnapping statute despite contention that indictment failed to charge that victim was \held for ransom or reward or otherwise\
• jury trial waiver in first trial held not binding on retrial after mistrial
• dictum: withdrawal allowable of right after mistrial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).