United States v. Thomas M. Cunningham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that withdrawal of objection to admis- sion of photos resulted in a waiver of the argument that the government had failed to set forth sufficient foundation for the evidence
• “Although Cunningham’s trial counsel initially objected to admission of the pictures, he later explicitly withdrew his objection and furthermore failed to make any additional objections in the proceedings below to their admission.”
• “To the extent that [defendant] argues that the court’s upward departure [not mandated by the guidelines] violates the Sixth amendment, he is correct.”
• “To the extent that [defendant] argues that the court’s upward departure [not No. 04-21014 -5- mandated by the guidelines] violates the Sixth Amendment, he is correct.”
• 210-month sentence for 7218 UNITED STATES v. GARNER producing child pornography not unreasonable
• “. . . Cunningham’s attorney’s affirmative decision to withdraw his objection to the admission of the pictures as exhibits resulted in a waiver of any argument that the government failed to set forth a sufficient foundation for their admission.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).