Skip to main content
· 9/12/1990

United States v. Thomas Lindley Roberts

Citations

  • 915 F.2d 889
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 16001

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that finders of fact, in that case jurors, “certainly consist of the requisite reasonable people” in the true threat analysis
  • “While a relevant consideration is whether an ordinary reasonable recipient who is familiar with the context of the letter would interpret it as a threat of injury, there is no requirement that the actual recipient testify.”
  • consider- 5 ing the recipient's interpretation of phone calls or letters
  • prosecuting under 18 U.S.C. § 115(a)(1)(B)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murnaghan, Smith, Federal, Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.