United States v. Thomas Lee Rutledge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that falsely denying “relevant conduct” which a defendant could otherwise remain silent about may be considered in denying reduction for acceptance of responsibility
• finding impairments that can be 2 1 controlled effectively with treatment are not disabling
• “[The defendant is] not required to confess to any relevant conduct beyond the offense of conviction in order to obtain the reduction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).