United States v. Thomas Kruger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that ex post facto violations have arisen when plaintiffs seek credits that would have been available to them at the time of conviction
• “There is no question that Amendment 759 applies to prisoners convicted for acts committed before the provision’s effective date” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Henry Hill v. Rick Snyder
  Sixth Circuit· 2017-12-20· cited 204×
• United States v. Ramirez
  Second Circuit· 2017-01-25· cited 11×
• Henry Hill v. Rick Snyder
  Sixth Circuit· 2018-08-14· cited 10×
• United States v. Holcomb
  Tenth Circuit· 2017-04-11

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Weaver v. Graham
  Supreme Court· 1981-02-24· cited 2,482×
• Dillon v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2010-06-17· cited 2,002×
• California Department of Corrections v. Morales
  Supreme Court· 1995-04-25· cited 1,142×
• Peugh v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2013-06-10· cited 771×
• Lynce v. Mathis
  Supreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 732×
• Garner v. Jones
  Supreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 550×
• Joseph P. Dyer III v. James Bowlen, Warden
  Sixth Circuit· 2006-08-30· cited 99×
• United States v. Christina Elizabeth Colon
  Eleventh Circuit· 2013-02-06· cited 94×
• United States v. Watkins
  Sixth Circuit· 2010-11-03· cited 45×
• United States v. Franklin Thompson
  Third Circuit· 2016-06-07· cited 45×
• United States v. Willie Diggs
  Seventh Circuit· 2014-09-24· cited 29×
• United States v. Geary Waters, Jr.
  Ninth Circuit· 2014-11-14· cited 27×
• United States v. Robert Welch
  Sixth Circuit· 2012-08-02· cited 7×