Skip to main content
· 12/8/2003

United States v. Thomas J. Bernard

Citations

  • 351 F.3d 360
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 24659
  • 2003 WL 22880839

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that because restitution does not concern a defendant’s custodial sentence, it is not challengeable in § 2255 proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Beam, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.