Skip to main content
· 5/12/1992

United States v. Thomas H. Hornick

Citations

  • 963 F.2d 546
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 12070
  • 1992 WL 96005

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding resentencing because “[t]he original sentence was thus a reflection of the district court’s assessment of the aggregate gravity of Hornick’s crimes, not a sum arrived at through discrete consideration of distinct crimes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feinberg, Winter, Altimari

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.