· 5/12/1992
United States v. Thomas H. Hornick
Citations
- 963 F.2d 546
- 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 12070
- 1992 WL 96005
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding resentencing because “[t]he original sentence was thus a reflection of the district court’s assessment of the aggregate gravity of Hornick’s crimes, not a sum arrived at through discrete consideration of distinct crimes”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Feinberg, Winter, Altimari
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.