Skip to main content
· 6/27/2005

United States v. Thomas Flaschberger

Citations

  • 408 F.3d 941
  • 2005 WL 1274280

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding error where the district court ordered restitution for losses from years preceding the scheme alleged in indictment
  • He “had his eyes so tightly shut that the ‘ostrich’ inference supports a finding of intent to deceive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Ripple, Manton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.