D.C. Circuit· 8/14/1972
United States v. Thomas E. Stanley
Citations
- 469 F.2d 576
- 152 U.S. App. D.C. 170
- 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7941
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “‘[t]he District Judge’s reasoning must be delineated both out of fairness to the appellant and as an aid to this court’ ”
- judge must fairly explain ruling so that it may be intelligently reviewed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bazelon, Robinson, Wilkey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Robert P. DelkerThird Circuit· 1985-03-27· cited 174×
- United States v. Charles A. SimpkinsD.C. Circuit· 1987-08-14· cited 122×
- United States v. Mark Allan BaykoFirst Circuit· 1985-09-27· cited 82×
- United States v. Anthony Provenzano, in No. 79-1912, and Thomas Andretta, in No. 79-1913Third Circuit· 1979-08-21· cited 79×
- Vito Finetti v. David Harris, Superintendent of Greenhaven Correctional FacilitySecond Circuit· 1979-09-12· cited 59×
- United States v. Texas Education Agency (South Park Independent School District)Fifth Circuit· 1981-05-28· cited 55×
- United States v. James Glenn, A/K/A James M. GreenD.C. Circuit· 1973-01-30· cited 54×
- State v. WassillieAlaska Supreme Court· 1980-02-29· cited 33×
- United States v. MirandaS.D. Florida· 1977-12-14· cited 22×
- United States v. William Colon BerriosFirst Circuit· 1986-04-23· cited 11×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2006-11-24· cited 11×
- United States v. Dorothy WheelerNinth Circuit· 1986-07-28· cited 10×
- United States v. AustinD. New Mexico· 1985-08-19· cited 9×
- United States v. Kevin Elwood KrzyskeSixth Circuit· 1988-09-21· cited 8×
- United States v. Constanza Perdomo, United States of America v. Constanza PerdomoNinth Circuit· 1985-09-06· cited 7×
- United States v. Breck M. SwanquistSeventh Circuit· 1997-09-17· cited 7×
- United States v. LaneN.D. Illinois· 2002-01-30· cited 7×
- Marks v. ZelinskiD. New Jersey· 1985-03-27· cited 6×
- State v. OlmsteadNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1976-04-29· cited 6×
- State v. BootonSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1974-02-28· cited 6×
Cites
46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court· 1952-01-02· cited 1,157×
- United States v. Benjamin J. ThompsonD.C. Circuit· 1972-03-20· cited 120×
- United States v. MotlowSeventh Circuit· 1926-02-25· cited 62×
- Daniel J. Donovan v. Esso Shipping CompanyThird Circuit· 1958-09-17· cited 55×
- Ryan v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1964-11-23· cited 54×
- Robert W. Baker v. Thomas R. Sard and Donald J. Sheehy. Robert W. Baker v. Thomas R. Sard, Chairman, Board of ParoleD.C. Circuit· 1969-10-15· cited 46×
- United States v. James E. Leathers, United States of America v. David Matthew Williams, IIID.C. Circuit· 1969-04-17· cited 39×
- Norman Pannell v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1963-05-16· cited 38×
- Bobby Russell v. United States of America, Larry G. Lee v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1968-05-29· cited 37×
- Franklyn Weaver v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1968-10-04· cited 37×
- James Steven Hogg v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1969-05-28· cited 37×
- E. L. Cord, Individually and Doing Business as Los Angeles Broadcasting Company, and v. Calvin J. Smith, AndNinth Circuit· 1966-12-15· cited 36×
- Vance L. Wood v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1968-01-19· cited 27×
- William Banks v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1969-05-26· cited 24×
- United States v. Danny BacaTenth Circuit· 1971-06-29· cited 24×
- David L. Hansford v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1965-10-29· cited 21×
- Curtis Lee Allen, Jr. v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1967-10-20· cited 19×
- United States v. Damon Alston, Jr.D.C. Circuit· 1969-08-20· cited 17×
- Cain v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1945-03-09· cited 17×
- Clifton Hairston v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1965-02-02· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.