United States v. Thomas E. MacEy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In a mail fraud case, a defendant is liable for the acts of his co-conspirator even if the indictment did not charge conspiracy.”
• hold- ing that improper introduction of extrinsic acts evidence was harmless in light of overwhelming evidence of guilt as well as limiting instructions
• “We have long recognized that ‘[i]t is not essential that the indictment contain a separate count charging conspiracy in order to take advantage of the doctrines peculiar to conspiracy.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).