Seventh Circuit· 2/25/1999
United States v. Thomas D. Jensen
Citations
- 169 F.3d 1044
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 2940
- 1999 WL 93387
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant challenged his stepfather’s consent to search car he was driving but that his stepfather owned
- disagreement between two officers as to when a conversation occurred did not make their testimony exceedingly improbable
- “The officers’ reasonable belief that the person consenting to the search had authority to do so is all that is necessary for a consent search to be valid.”
- “We defer to the trial court’s credibility determinations because ‘only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wood, Ripple, Rovner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Patty Carradine v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecuritySeventh Circuit· 2004-03-12· cited 421×
- Joseph Wilborn v. David EaleySeventh Circuit· 2018-02-07· cited 276×
- United States v. Joseph N. BasinskiSeventh Circuit· 2000-09-05· cited 210×
- United States v. JacksonSeventh Circuit· 2010-03-12· cited 112×
- United States v. Shawna Leanne SmithSeventh Circuit· 2000-07-14· cited 59×
- United States v. RossSeventh Circuit· 2007-12-14· cited 59×
- United States v. Joseph L. CellittiSeventh Circuit· 2004-10-19· cited 54×
- United States v. GrovesSeventh Circuit· 2008-06-27· cited 51×
- United States v. Arriel S. WilliamsSeventh Circuit· 2000-03-28· cited 44×
- United States v. Alan K. CherrySeventh Circuit· 2006-02-03· cited 44×
- United States v. Stacy L. BriggsSeventh Circuit· 2001-11-30· cited 39×
- United States v. JamesSeventh Circuit· 2009-07-09· cited 32×
- Julio Ortiz v. Zulima MartinezSeventh Circuit· 2015-06-15· cited 26×
- United States v. ScottDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-01-28· cited 22×
- State v. VanhollebekeWashington Supreme Court· 2018-03-15· cited 6×
- Gomillion v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2016-02-22· cited 3×
- United States v. CorleyN.D. Indiana· 2004-09-15
- United States v. OsborneC.D. Illinois· 2007-06-13
- United States v. Williams, Arriel S.Seventh Circuit· 2000-03-28
- United States v. Smith, Shawna L.Seventh Circuit· 2000-07-14
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 11,658×
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 2,581×
- United States v. Armando Chaidez, Lilia Silva, and Manuel ChaviraSeventh Circuit· 1991-01-07· cited 136×
- United States v. Cesar DuranSeventh Circuit· 1992-03-17· cited 108×
- United States v. Jairo Cardona-Rivera and Gustavo Luna SanchezSeventh Circuit· 1990-06-12· cited 107×
- United States v. Harry ShololaSeventh Circuit· 1997-08-22· cited 89×
- United States v. Randy L. McEntire and Mark R. Wilkins, Sr.Seventh Circuit· 1998-08-11· cited 79×
- United States v. Yvonne StriblingSeventh Circuit· 1996-08-26· cited 63×
- United States v. Dickson VerasSeventh Circuit· 1995-06-21· cited 56×
- United States v. Juan H. LomeliSeventh Circuit· 1996-02-06· cited 34×
- Bennett v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1995-11-27· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.