Skip to main content
· 12/8/2006

United States v. Thomas B. McLaughlin and Christine McLaughlin

Citations

  • 470 F.3d 698
  • 66 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1393
  • 98 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 8111
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 30112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “if good cause for the delay is shown, the court must extend the time for service, while if good cause is not shown, the court has a choice between dismissing the suit and giving the plaintiff more time”
  • holding that “if good cause for the delay is shown, the court must extend the time for service, while if good cause is not shown, the court has a choice between dismissing the suit and giving the plaintiff more time”
  • noting that inability of professional process servers to locate defendant is evidence of evasion
  • allowing Rule 6(b) extensions for time for service when plaintiff fails to meet a previously granted Rule 4(m) extension
  • allowing Rule 6(b) extensions for time for service when plaintiff fails to meet a previously granted Rule 4(m) extension
  • noting “the wisdom of Rule 4(m) in allowing a judge to excuse a delay in service even if the plaintiff has no excuse at all”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Posner, Coffey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.