Sixth Circuit· 5/13/2010

United States v. Thomas

Citations

605 F.3d 300
2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 9838
2010 WL 1904908

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that elevated electrical usage corroborated the informant’s tip that the defendant was a marijuana grower
holding that elevated electrical usage both corroborated and refreshed the informant’s tip that the defendant was a marijuana grower
holding that elevated electrical usage corroborated the informant's tip that the defendant was a marijuana grower
holding that elevated electrical usage both corroborated and refreshed the informant’s tip that the defendant was a marijuana grower
noting that the dissenting opinion “improperly divides and attacks the evidence provided in the affidavit instead of viewing the evidence in its totality”
noting that the dissenting opinion “improperly divides and attacks the evidence provided in the affidavit instead of viewing the evidence in its totality”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy, Moore, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.