United States v. Thirty-Five Barrels of Highwines

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the plaintiffs arguments that an “isolated and rather general comment that defendant objected to plaintiffs use of its mark, either on its own or viewed in conjunction with the language present in the Oppositions, meets the MedImmune standard”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).