Skip to main content
· 6/30/2011

United States v. Theunick

Citations

  • 651 F.3d 578
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 13311
  • 2011 WL 2566883

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “unreviewable” a district court’s informed decision to deny a downward departure for health under U.S.S.G. § 5H1.4
  • finding a departure unreviewable in the U.S.S.G. § 5H1.4 context for these reasons
  • “A trial judge is not required to adopt the language suggested by a defendant in [its] instructions to the jury.” (quotation marks omitted)
  • “In rare situations a defendant may clearly demonstrate an acceptance of responsibility for his criminal conduct even though he exercises his constitutional right to a trial.” (quoting U.S. Sent’g Guidelines Manual § 3E1.1 cmt. n.2)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin, Siler, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.