United States v. Theodore Linn, United States of America v. Philip Sturlin, United States of America v. Guy Sturlin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that limiting instructions could cure the prejudice caused by a phone call that implicated the defendants but was inadmissible against them
• finding no plain error for prosecutor’s “distasteful” comment that “a defense attorney’s job is to mislead the jury in order to garner an acquittal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).