Skip to main content
· 6/15/1993

United States v. Theodore Joseph, United States of America v. Leroy Davis

Citations

  • 996 F.2d 36
  • 28 V.I. 438
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 13780

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the more difficult Brady situation is where certain exculpatory evidence is available to the prosecution but not within its actual knowledge
  • explaining that, to demonstrate suppression, we apply an objective standard and “consider whether the prosecutor knew or should have known of the materials”
  • identifying the “linchpin” of Perdomo’s holding that the prosecution should be charged with constructive possession
  • identifying the \linchpin\ of Perdomo's holding that the prosecution should be charged with constructive possession
  • identifying the “linchpin” of Perdomo’s holding that the prosecution should be charged with constructive possession
  • “We will not interpret Brady to require prosecutors to search their unrelated files to exclude the possibility, however remote, that they contain exculpatory information”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greenberg, Scirica, Garth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.