Skip to main content
· 10/15/1861

United States v. The William Arthur

Citations

  • 28 F. Cas. 624
  • 3 Ware 276

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In light of the above determinations [granting] the motion to dismiss, the Court does not find a likelihood of success on the merits of Plaintiffs’ claims, and the motion for preliminary injunction is therefore denied.”
  • “The broader markets alleged, therefore, are 12 not supported by the facts.”
  • “The broader markets alleged, therefore, are 22 not supported by the facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ware

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.