United States v. The Thomas Swan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding remand appropriate where administrative hearing officer was “uniquely well suited” to review an issue on the merits
• remanding case to the SRO because it is “uniquely well suited to review the content and implementation of the student’s IEP” as well as the claims concerning the “[defendant’s] accommodation of the student’s sensory needs”
• “[A]n IHO’s decision is ‘binding’ upon the parties absent an appeal to the SRO.”
• “[R]ather than reaching the merits of the unreviewed claims, [the Court] remand[s] this matter to the SRO, who is uniquely well suited to review the content and implementation of the Student’s IEP.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).