United States v. The Picayune

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If the statutory language is unambiguous and the statutory scheme is coherent and consistent, no further inquiry is needed.”
• “If the statutory language is unambiguous and the statutory scheme is coherent and consistent, no further inquiry is needed.” (quoting Brady v. Gov’t of the V.I., 57 V.I. 433, 441 (V.I. 2012))
• “[T]he grant of limited judicial authority to an administrative agency does not transform the agency into a court.” (quoting Ocean Hill Joint Venture v. N.C. Dept. of Envr., Health & Nat. Resources, 333 N.C. 318, 426 S.E.2d 274, 276 (1993))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).