· 2/23/1872
United States v. The Missouri
Citations
- 26 F. Cas. 1273
- 9 Blatchf. 433
- 15 Int. Rev. Rec. 74
- 1872 U.S. App. LEXIS 1462
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that to assert standing to challenge a statute as unconstitutional, a litigant must show that he suffered an actual or threatened injury
- holding that to assert standing to challenge a statute as unconstitutional, a litigant must show that he suffered an actual or threatened injury
- noting that “language in both decisions of the Supreme Court indicatfes] that the Court did not intend to invalidate all gun regulatory schemes”
- noting that plain error requires (1) an error, (2) that was plain, (3) that affected the defendant’s substantial rights, and (4) that affected the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings
- defining plain error as (1) an error, (2) which was plain, (3) which affected substantial rights, and (4) which we find seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of the judicial proceedings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Woodruff
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.