United States v. The Meteor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an appellate court “must presume that jurors followed the instructions that they were given.”
• noting that “ ‘we do generally presume that juries follow their instructions’ ” (quoting United States v. Liburd, 607 F.3d 339, 344, 53 V.I. 890 (3d Cir. 2010))
• finding sufficient evidence of reckless endangerment when gunshots fired on public road in front of a restaurant with persons present
• stating an appellate court “must presume that jurors followed the instructions that they were given”
• recognizing presumption that jurors will follow final jury instructions
• discussing sufficiency of evidence supporting a conviction for reckless endangerment, based on analogous facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).