United States v. Tersea Adela Ashby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no abuse of discretion where district court declined to question all the jurors about their conversations with the tainted juror and instead polled the jurors about whether they believed their ability to be fair and impartial had been compromised
• admitting a car title showing that the defendant owned the car as non-hearsay, because the title was not admitted to show actual ownership of the vehicle, but rather, to show that the defendant had a connection to the car in which drugs were found
• no error when the prosecution did not offer the documents to prove the truth of the information in them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).