United States v. Terry Lee Rhodes, and Charles Dudley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that corroborating circumstances did not clearly indicate the trustworthiness of a statement made to an attorney for the benefit of a co-conspirator
• concluding that there was insufficient evidence to prove that bounty hunter acted as a government agent when he set up a meeting between defendant and undercover officer that led to arrest
• considering conspiratorial relationship between declarant and defendant in assessing corroborating circumstances
• no evidence that bounty hunter acted as government agent at time he arranged meeting between defendant and undercover postal inspectors
• bounty hunter’s exchange of information with police did not make him government agent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).