United States v. Territory of the Virgin Islands Ex Rel. DiRuzzo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the decision as to whether to grant permissive intervention is “highly discretionary”
• affirming the District Court’s denial of a motion for permissive intervention and for intervention as of right
• finding denial of motion to intervene under both Rules 24(a) and (b) proper since motion was untimely, prejudicial, and unnecessary
• “Although these requirements are intertwined, each must be met to intervene as of right.”
• “Although these requirements are intertwined, each must be met to intervene as of right.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).