United States v. Terri Killen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff intended to fraudulently receive social security benefits until age 65
• explaining that intended loss includes “expected” loss because “a person is presumed to have intended the natural and probable consequences of his or her actions” (quotation marks omitted)
• addressing the district court’s loss calculation, not whether a Section 2B1.1(b)(1) enhancement was applicable
• “[T]he court may accept the facts as true and rely on the unobjected-to facts in determining whether to impose an enhancement.” (quoting United States v. Douglas, 646 F.3d 1134, 1137 (8th Cir. 2011))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).