United States v. Terrence A. Kubiak, David Parks, Theodore Burton, IV

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the government’s failure to comply with discovery rules was not reversible error where the defendant did not move for a continuance
• holding that defendant’s initial “arrest” by the Coast Guard did not trigger the Speedy Trial Act, because the defendants “were not held to answer in federal court until they were indicted”
• holding that defendant’s initial “arrest” by the Coast Guard did not trigger the Speedy Trial Act, because the defendants “were not held to answer in federal court until they were indicted”
• affirming denial of a motion to dismiss an indictment because the defendants “were not held to answer in federal court until they were indicted”
• rejecting “the prejudice now com- plained of by the appellant” when the appellant had “never asked for a recess, let alone a continuance . . . [but] simply acquiesced in the continuation of the trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).