United States v. Terrance Thornton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an encounter was consensual where three offic- ers approached a defendant in public and did not show weap- ons, touch him, or use a tone or language that would have communicated to the defendant that he was seized
• holding that an encounter was consensual where three offic- ers approached a defendant in public and did not show weap- ons, touch him, or use a tone or language that would have communicated to the defendant that he was seized
• holding that an encounter was consensual where three offic- ers approached a defendant in public and did not show weap- ons, touch him, or use a tone or language that would have communicated to the defendant that he was seized
• assuming that Illinois burglary, which requires an entry “without authority,” meets the Tay‐ lor definition of “an unlawful or unprivileged entry”
• finding probable cause to arrest defendant existed at time that officer learned of outstanding warrant
• rejecting the claim “that the jury was required to pass on the existence of all qualifying con- victions” under the ACCA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).