United States v. Terrance Ross Willaman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that because the defendant was not in custody, “[o]f course, in these circumstances Miranda is not implicated”
• concluding that because the defendant was not in custody, “[o]f course, in these circumstances Miranda is not implicated”
• holding that “the failure of the grand jury foreperson to sign the indictment [w]as a mere technical deficiency, and thus concluding] that [the defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the indictment d[id] not raise an issue entitling him to relief’
• reasoning that § 3161(c)(1), “by its terms, is applicable only in a ‘case in which a plea of not guilty is entered’ and until the arraignment there could not have been a plea”
• starting speedy-trial clock on date of arraignment when defendant pleaded not guilty, which occurred five days after initial appearance before a magistrate judge when bail was set
• explain- ing that the date of a motion’s filing is excluded for the pur- poses of “calculating includable time” under the Speedy Trial Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).