United States v. Ternus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[C]onspiracy and the related substantive offense which is the object of the conspiracy are separate and distinct crimes.”
• When a defendant is charged with conspiring to transport stolen goods in foreign commerce, the government is not required to prove that the stolen goods were actually transported in foreign commerce.
• When a defendant is charged with conspiring to transport stolen goods in foreign commerce, the government is not required to prove that the stolen goods were actually transported in foreign commerce.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Moreland
  Fifth Circuit· 2011-12-14· cited 75×
• Nordahl v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-06-03· cited 30×
• United States v. Wojcikiewicz
  Eleventh Circuit· 2010-11-24· cited 1×
• United States v. Bustamante
  Eleventh Circuit· 2018-02-28

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Amadou Fall Ndiaye
  Eleventh Circuit· 2006-01-06· cited 196×
• Alikhani v. United States
  Eleventh Circuit· 2000-01-11· cited 145×
• United States v. Brown
  Eleventh Circuit· 2009-11-05· cited 84×
• United States v. Lent Christopher Carr, II
  Fourth Circuit· 2001-11-05· cited 75×
• United States v. Armando Lopez, Felix A. Beruvides, Ricardo Perez, United States of America v. Felix A. Beruvides
  Eleventh Circuit· 1990-08-03· cited 69×
• United States v. Robert Paul Sarro, John Michael Tiedeberg, James Gennaro Tortoriello
  Eleventh Circuit· 1984-12-13· cited 40×
• United States v. Viscome
  Eleventh Circuit· 1998-06-26· cited 39×