United States v. Teniah Tercero

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the government waived waiver by failing to assert it in the district court
• distinguishing between broad instructions and “the kind of specific language that required invalidation” in LaBonte
• rejecting argument that U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10 conflicts with the Fair Sentencing Act and holding that Administrative Procedure Act’s arbitrary and capricious standard did not apply to promulgation of § 1B1.10
• “[T]he district court concluded correctly that under the revised version of § 1B1.10, it could not adjust [the defendant]’s sentence below 70 months.”
• “[T]he district court concluded correctly that under the revised version of § 1B1.10, it could not adjust [the defendant]’s sentence below 70 months.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).