United States v. Teng Yang

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that transporting defendant to a different airport terminal did not convert stop into an arrest.
• noting that “extent of surveillance” is one of the “[c]ircumstances that courts consider” but upholding search despite 30-45 minute break in surveillance
• noting that the “final factor in the extended border search doctrine is analogous to a Terry stop”
• finding that law enforcement “had a reasonable suspicion that criminal activity was occurring” where, among other things, the suspect was in a “highly restricted . . . area”
• finding the brief time defendant endured in handcuffs negated conclusion that he was under arrest
• listing defendant’s travel itinerary as a factor to consider for reasonable suspicion purposes by customs agents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).