United States v. Ten Erotic Paintings

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• vacating the trial court's termination order where an Arkansas court made the initial child-custody determination and \there [was] no Arkansas order in the record stating that Arkansas no longer [had] jurisdiction\
• exclusive, continuing jurisdiction may be lost if \all of the parties to the custody dispute have moved away from the state\
• “[T]he children had been living in New Hanover County since 1 August 2000, and the petition was filed 21 March 2002. Thus, the home state requirement was satisfied.”
• “In the case before our - 19 - IN RE: R.G. Opinion of the Court Court, there is no Arkansas order in the record stating that Arkansas no longer has jurisdiction.”
• “In the case before our - 19 - IN RE: R.G. Opinion of the Court Court, there is no Arkansas order in the record stating that Arkansas no longer has jurisdiction.”
• Although North Carolina was the home state of the children, North Carolina did not have subject matter jurisdiction over the proceedings to terminate the mother's parental rights. Nothing in the record showed N.C. Gen.Stat. § 50A-203(1) or (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).