Skip to main content
· 7/25/1989

United States v. Ted A. Lewis

Citations

  • 880 F.2d 243
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 12342
  • 1989 WL 80629

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requirements of Rule 32(a)(1)(A) satisfied when defendant’s counsel told sentencing judge that defendant had read presentence report

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hug, Hall, O'Scannlain

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.